How left responded to '84 elections
Socialist Workers Party called for break with capitalist politics
BY PETER THIERJUNG
A significant feature of the 1984 presidential elections was the fact that most
organizations and publications that consider themselves socialist or communist
backed capitalist candidate Walter Mondale. Some groups did so openly, while
others did so under the slogan "Defeat Reagan." The Socialist Workers
Party ran the only campaign calling for independent working-class political
action in the elections, putting forward the socialist perspective of struggle
to replace the capitalist U.S. government with a workers and farmers
government.
A review of the positions put forward by some left groups on the elections is
useful in highlighting a few key lessons of this campaign.
'Guardian'
The Guardian, a radical newsweekly published in New York, departed from
past practice and for the first time in a presidential campaign openly urged a
vote for the Democrats. In endorsing Mondale, the August 8 Guardian
argued that, "A defeat for the reactionaries in November can offer"
an important breathing space to the left and progressive forces in the U.S.
and, perhaps more importantly, to the liberation movements and anti-imperialist
countries around the world."
When Mondale came out just a few weeks later endorsing the U.S. invasion of
Grenada and threatening to "quarantine" Nicaragua, the Guardian
squirmed a bit, but didn't back down one inch from urging a big vote for
Mondale .
Workers World Party
The Workers World Party campaigned vigorously for capitalist candidate Jesse
Jackson. When Jackson lost the Democratic Party nomination to Mondale, Workers
World decided to step up its own campaign of Larry Holmes for president and
Gloria La Riva for vice-president, rather than endorse Mondale.
This represented no break from capitalist politics, however. The September 6
issue of the party's paper Workers World, reporting on Jackson's endorsement of
Mondale, insisted that it had been correct to support Jackson's Democratic
Party campaign and that the task was now to "build an even stronger
independent working class movement to carry on the legacy of the Rainbow
Coalition." According to the paper, "The candidacy of Jesse Jackson,
particularly during the Democratic primaries, was objectively an independent
campaign that exposed and challenged the racist structure and rules of the anti-poor,
anti-worker bourgeois Democratic Party."
Democratic Socialists
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) has always supported Democratic
candidates. This is in line with its outlook of accepting the framework of U.S.
imperialism and seeking merely to reform it.
Declaring that ''We are Americans and democratic socialists and
Democrats," the DSA endorsed the Mondale-Ferraro ticket saying,
"They.... have the potential to create a liberal and humane administration
infinitely superior to Ronald Reagan's on every count."
Advising the Democratic Party on how to win the election, Michael Harrington, a
central leader of the DSA, pointed to the example of Harry Truman, who as
Democratic president ordered the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Writing in the May-June issue of Democratic Left, the DSA newsletter,
Harrington said: "Think of Truman again. He is not my hero ... but we can
sure learn from him. He talked tough facts in 1948. He talked to workers and
blacks and farmers; he mobilized . . . . And he won. And we can win in 1984,
but only if we are at least as much a bunch of hell raisers as he and his
friends."
Communist Party
The Communist Party (CP) ran its own candidates, Gus Hall and Angela Davis, for
president and vice-president. While not formally endorsing the Democratic
ticket, the clear message of the Hall-Davis campaign was to defeat Reagan by
electing Mondale. This is not a new position for the CP; it has backed liberal
capitalist candidates for half a century.
"For the period of the 1984 elections," Gus Hall told a CP central
committee meeting last June, "all our creative energies must be focused on
defeating Reaganism." "The reality," Hall was quoted as saying
in the June 21 Daily World, the CP paper, "is that the electable candidate
against Reagan is the lesser evil." He explained that the CP should only
criticize Mondale if it would help strengthen the Democratic campaign.
"Our party will express its differences and criticisms of the Democratic
candidate when we think that will add to the struggle against Reaganism."
As the polls began to more and more confirm that Reagan had a strong lead over
Mondale, the CP campaign took on a shrill pitch. It argued that U.S. capitalism
is rapidly moving toward fascism under Reagan and that unity of all
"anti-Reagan" forces was desperately needed to prevent another
Republican term in office.
An editorial titled "Fascist odor" in the October 6 issue of the
People's World, the CP's West Coast weekly, conveyed this view: "We do not
use the term 'fascism' lightly. It is not just the normal, oppressive,
exploitative, and brutal rule of capital that has characterized this system
since its advent 200 years ago. It is rule by a special sector of that capital,
the very sector which put Ronald Reagan in the White House and in whose
interests he presently serves. It can happen here. It is a clear and present
danger, and good reason to make sure the Oval Office has a new resident after
Nov. 6."
The U.S. capitalist class will certainly prove capable of attempting to impose
fascist rule, but that is not what is happening today.
The CP portrays Reagan as representing a "fascist" wing in order to
cover up the fact that there is bipartisan support for the employers' policies
of war, racism, and attacks on democratic rights. Mondale would have driven
this antilabor offensive forward had he been elected, just as Reagan has done.
Both represent the same fundamental class interests - the opposite of the
interests of workers and working farmers. The U.S. rulers will step up their
assault on working people here and abroad. Big class battles are going to
erupt. But the best way to prepare working people for these battles is to tell
them the unvarnished truth about the Republican and Democratic parties. The CP
candidates have done the opposite. Let's take a few examples.
Fight against imperialist war
Throughout the campaign, Hall and Davis argued that nuclear war could well be
the result of another four years of Reagan, while the world would be safer with
Mondale in office.
As part of prettifying the imperialist policies of the
Democrats, the CP- endorsed their call for a bilateral freeze on nuclear
weapons production in the United States and the Soviet Union. This stance blurs
the real source of war - U.S. imperialism and its twin parties - and implies
the Soviet Union shares some responsibility for the nuclear arms buildup, for
which Washington alone is to blame.
The CP's support for Mondale led it to downplay the current war against
Nicaragua and El Salvador being carried out with the support of Democrats and
Republicans alike . It is precisely in such shooting wars that the danger of
Washington using its nuclear arsenal is posed. But rather than expose the
bipartisan character of the war drive, the CP told working people that voting
Reagan out of office was the best way to guarantee peace. As Davis put it in an
interview in the July 12 Daily World, "the most immediate priority
of all in the peace movement, of all who are threatened by nuclear
conflagration, is the defeat of Reagan and his pathologically anti-Communist
Administration."
Adaptation to the Democrats on the war question has led the CP to bend also to
the chauvinist propaganda campaigns of both capitalist parties. For example,
the October 24 Daily World gave favorable coverage to AFL-CIO Pres. Lane
Kirkland's recent tour to garner votes for Mondale. The paper quoted
uncritically Kirkland's anti-imports patriotic line, reporting that the AFL-CIO
bureaucrat attacked Reagan as "a man who appeals to patriotism for the
benefit of those business and banking interests who would sell their own
country out - people who don't care what flag flies over their plants or shops
or ships." The CP has even gone so far as to print issues of the Daily
World in red, white, and blue.
Abortion rights
Over the last few months, women's right to legal abortion has come under attack
from right-wing groups, the Catholic Church hierarchy, and Democratic and
Republican politicians; While claiming she will uphold legal abortion as long
as it is the law of the land, Democratic vice-presidential candidate Geraldine
Ferraro has emphasized her personal and religious view that abortion is murder.
Explaining why she has voted for some Medicaid funding for abortions, Ferraro
said, "The cost of putting an unwanted child through the system far
outweighs the cost of funding an abortion on demand." This is the line of
the racist, population-control forces.
What has been the CP's response to Ferraro's reactionary views on abortion
rights? A September 21 column in the Daily World rushed to defend her!
"Ms. Ferraro's position on abortions is a principled, democratic
position," it said.
SWP campaign
The Socialist Workers Party and Young Socialist Alliance approached the 1984
elections from a completely different standpoint than the other groups on the
U.S. left.
The SWP ran 56 candidates for local office in 26 states. Its candidate for
president was Mel Mason; for vice-president, Andrea Gonzalez.
The fight against imperialist war was at the center of the Mason-Gonzalez
campaign as they visited plant gates, union halls, picket lines, farming areas,
and working-class, Black, and Latino neighborhoods across the country. They
talked to working people about the gains workers and peasants have won in
Nicaragua and Cuba, and stressed the important role the labor movement must
play in opposing U.S. intervention in Central· America and the Caribbean.
The socialists called for international working-class solidarity with others
fighting for their rights, from the striking British coal miners, to Puerto
Ricans demanding independence, to Blacks struggling against South Africa's
apartheid, to the workers and farmers of Vietnam and Kampuchea .
Mason and Gonzalez opposed the reactionary anti-imports, protectionist schemes
used to falsely label workers in other countries as the source of unemployment
in the United States, rather than the U.S, employers ..
The SWP ticket was the only one that consistently defended abortion rights.
Mason and Gonzalez demanded repeal of all laws restricting the right to safe,
legal abortion. They called for restoring- and expanding - government funds for
women who want abortions and cannot afford them.
The socialists explained that the problems of war, attacks on Black and women's
rights, farm foreclosures, and union-busting cannot be solved at the ballot
box. They explained the need for working people to reject the Democratic and
Republican parties- the twin parties of war, exploitation, racism, and sexism.
What ·is needed, they said, is independent working-class political action that
can organize and mobilize the victims of class exploitation to overturn
capitalist rule and establish a workers and farmers government.
Mason and Gonzalez called for a labor party based on a fighting, democratic
trade union movement that will champion the interests of workers, farmers,
Blacks, Latinos, women, and other ' victims of capitalism. They also called for
the formation of an independent Black political party, which would not only be
an advance for Blacks, but also help inspire and hasten the development of a
labor party. The goal of the labor party, they explained, will be to lead the
struggle for a workers and farmers government in the United States that will
use the vast resources and technology of this country to aid in eliminating
hunger, poverty and disease all over the globe. This government will abolish
capitalism in the United States and join the worldwide struggle for socialism.
Peter Thierjung is national secretary of the Young Socialist Alliance and
was a youth coordinator of the Mason/Gonzalez campaign .
November 16, 1984
The Militant
http://themilitant.com/1984/4842/MIL4842.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments