tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5282058542643659653.post5451992976742558239..comments2024-01-27T16:02:00.027-05:00Comments on Marxist update: George Novack in defense of Marxism: reading notes from Polemics in Marxist PhilosophyJay Rothermelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09531989615494104215noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5282058542643659653.post-36503039847607679662014-07-20T16:41:34.978-04:002014-07-20T16:41:34.978-04:00Thank you for your comment. I am certainly not qu...Thank you for your comment. I am certainly not qualified to discuss it, but clearly also Novack thought so.Jay Rothermelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09531989615494104215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5282058542643659653.post-68472777072100657352014-07-20T15:26:15.116-04:002014-07-20T15:26:15.116-04:00"Material nature's universal evolutionary..."Material nature's universal evolutionary process is dialectical in character. Proceeded through conflict of antagonistic forces."<br /><br />I do wonder whether this is true at the level of physics. (Electromagnetic phenomena exhibit the conflict of the opposite positive and negative charges, but the other three basic physical forces seem to lack opposites.)Stephen R. Diamondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07165258952900481659noreply@blogger.com